Just looking at Bilkos Stats page

ive noticed that no matter who the manager was the win/loss rate was pretty much the same since the 80,s onwards the only time the win loss made a difference was when Millward came in whe they lost more games than won There where times when the team went on a long winning run with all the managers! e.g when Monie took over he had a team of internationls and simply had tell to turn up! it was only around 2005 ish when the results became totally inconsistent for a few years even with Noble in charge! But when Madge took over and then Wane they won most of there games

I can't believe anyone would think that coaches like Andy Goodway, John Dorahy and Eric Hughes were as good as John Monie, whatever the stats say.

Thanks Frisky

In the hayday the coaches didn't hugely matter as the quality on the field largely coached themselves. The biggest example of this was under Dorohay. He lost the dressing room that much that Edwards used to lead training sessions and the players would train themselves.

What I am surprised is that our win rate under wane was the same as it was in some of the glory days? That can't be right surely?
For the majority of the wane years we played some very poor rugby and generally underperformed to the point of losing a large number of matches we never should have done. Yes, we won trophies, but runs towards the end of the season papered over some pretty bad performances in the ordinary seasons. Can't compare to win percentages under Monie etc surely?

As soon as the salary cap cam in around 1999 ish Leeds and Saints and Bradford signed better players than Wigan that is why they where won more trophies untill 2010

Super League era stats (yes I'm bored)

West (including his pre-SL record, which was roughly the same anyway) W 83% D 2%
Hughes W 57%
Monie W 80%
Goodway W 73% D 6%
Endacott W 73% D 4%
Raper W 72% D 2%
Gregory W 73% D 8%
Betts W 58% D 8%
Millward W 42%
Noble W 56% D 3%
Maguire W 76% D 4%
Wane W 67% D 2%
Lam W 62%

Goodway did better than I thought. But the comment someone else made about how, under Monie, players only had to turn up and we'd win is surely disproved by the figures Hughes brought home before Monie was reappointed.

That would have been more or less the same team. Not the great team of the early 90s, but a team that flunked under Hughes. So Monie must have done more a bit more than just watched.

It was also the case, if memory serves, that under Dorahy Wigan were doing very badly until Edwards and Bell got hold of the team. Another sign that even a great ream could under-perform if badly coached.

that was SL though in his second stint, in his first stint we pretty much did, loved the team under big Frank

I've just worked out Monie's pre-SL record. Exactly the same as his SL record. 80% won, 1% Drawn

Dorahy was also pre-SL and he nearly screwed us up until the players started ignoring him.

We threw the JP Final under Dorahy, something that would have been unthinkable to previous Wigan teams. That shows how much they were suffering under a boss who was completely out of his depth.

After that, I'll always believe that a bad coach - rather than a coach who just isn't very good - can mess up even a great team.

very much so

wonder what big game percentage was, I know during his time we played weakened teams etc when we had a massive amount of games in short periods