I am struggling to believe that an alleged top grade ref does not know you are played onside when the kicker passes you. I think cost us at least a point

Cost wakey the game. Wank ref. Simples

The offside player cannot be within 10 metres of the player catching the ball even if the kicker has run past him. Finn was inside 10 by the looks so technically it was the correct decision, albeit its a garbage rule as he wasn't interfering.

If he was within 10 meters of Hall, it was close. Like you say when their not involved at all it's a stupid rule anyway.

It was definately close but i think the fact it went up as a no try tipped the balance.

Well this is typical of our game. We change rules for no reason on a regular basis, every season. We fail to explain them to our fans. The fans cannot keep up with them. Even the Sky ref expert can’t! And the commentary team. I am sorry we are a bit of a joke as a sport and I love Rugby League. That was a try stupid rule fannying around or not

Sums it up nicely!

stupid rule, thought you guys where very good,

Unlucky guys thought you deserved it. Thought shaul should of being pulled up for knock on instead of them getting penalty and try. And all sky guys including Stuart Cummings said it should of being awarded he played Finn on side

What is annoying is he sent it up as a no try because he thought Hall had knocked on not for offside

Robbed, end of. Two silly women in front had the cheek to say they were missing Minachello

talk about clutching at straws